Case studies of our review outcomes
Gain insights into our work with our de-identified case studies of our review decisions.
Our decisions
These case studies of our decisions are for employees, managers and decision makers to understand how merits review works, our decision making processes and the diversity of the actions and decisions we review.
Information in these case studies is intended to be a guide, and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Decision-makers must consider the individual circumstances of each case before making a decision and not rely on case studies as an expected outcome.
Filter by code of conduct
Filter and reload results on this page by selecting an item below.
Filter by employment related actions
Filter and reload results on this page by selecting an item below.
Filter by decision type
Filter and reload results on this page by selecting an item below.
Search
8 result(s) found, displaying 1 to 8
Employee
Conduct and review practitioners
Case study
MPC recommended misconduct investigation be set aside due to procedural unfairness, bias.
Employee
Employers
Managers
Case study
Using an objective test in Code of Conduct matters
Employee
Employers
Conduct and review practitioners
Case study
Mitigating factors meant misconduct did not warrant a serious financial penalty
Employee
Employers
Managers
Conduct and review practitioners
Case study
Making sure parties have access to all the important information
Employee
Employers
Conduct and review practitioners
Case study
A fact finding process deviated from the terms of reference and failed to afford procedural fairness
Employee
Managers
Conduct and review practitioners
Case study
Reduction in classification for harassment
Employee
Former employees
Managers
Conduct and review practitioners
Case study
Mitigating factors taking into consideration when determining sanction decision
Employee
Managers
Conduct and review practitioners
Case study
case study reduction in classification for harassment