Case studies of our review outcomes
Gain insights into our work with our de-identified case studies of our review decisions.
Our decisions
These case studies of our decisions are for employees, managers and decision makers to understand how merits review works, our decision making processes and the diversity of the actions and decisions we review.
Information in these case studies is intended to be a guide, and should not be relied upon as legal advice. Decision-makers must consider the individual circumstances of each case before making a decision and not rely on case studies as an expected outcome.
Filter by code of conduct
Filter by employment related actions
Filter and reload results on this page by selecting an item below.
Filter by decision type
Filter and reload results on this page by selecting an item below.
Search
8 result(s) found, displaying 1 to 8
Employee
Recruitment team
Case study
Many recruitment and selection decisions are not eligible for review
Employee
Managers
Conduct and review practitioners
Case study
Performance management case study
Employee
Managers
Case study
case study reduction in classification for underperformance
Employee
Recruitment team
Case study
case study no serious defects in the selection process
Employee
Managers
Case study
Performance review outcome was unfair
Employee
Former employees
Managers
Conduct and review practitioners
Case study
The employee's criticism towards their manager was not justified in the circumstances
Employee
Recruitment team
Case study
The test of what is a 'serious defect' in an EL1 and EL2 recruitment process is a high standard
Employee
Managers
Conduct and review practitioners
Case study
Reduction in classification for underperformance